Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600

To: Jameson Rollins

Cc: notmuch

From: Rob Browning


Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:

> If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't
> themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm
> inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name.

Are persistent tags required here?  The original question at least,
seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has
encrypted or signed bits.  So I wondered if that might be accomplished
without actual tags.

Just curious.
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Thread: