Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes:

>> I think we might be better off in the long run replacing the call to
>> message-mail. Code duplication is obviously not great, but perhaps some
>> of the complexity of message-mail / message-pop-to-buffer can be
>> eliminated, since we don't need to support all of the use cases of
>> message-mail.
>
> OK. I'll try implement notmuch-message-mail as a simpler alternative to
> message-mail. Let's see how it will look like.

Thanks for giving it a try.

David