Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes: >> fi >> >> +if [ -n "${LD_PRELOAD-}" ]; then > > Is it problem to chain LD_PRELOADs here ? I see later in this message > there is LD_PRELOAD's concatenated with :'s (in case non-empty) ? > It is not a problem in general, but ASAN insists on being first in LD_PRELOAD, so it's easier just to skip the tests for now. I updated the printed message to printf "Skipping due to ASAN LD_PRELOAD restrictions\n" Since I also could not remember why that was there :P. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org