Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

>>  fi
>>  
>> +if [ -n "${LD_PRELOAD-}" ]; then
>
> Is it problem to chain LD_PRELOADs here ? I see later in this message
> there is LD_PRELOAD's concatenated with :'s (in case non-empty) ?
>

It is not a problem in general, but ASAN insists on being first in
LD_PRELOAD, so it's easier just to skip the tests for now.  I updated
the printed message to

    printf "Skipping due to ASAN LD_PRELOAD restrictions\n"

Since I also could not remember why that was there :P.
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org