Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2017, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote: >> Looking at the defaults from another angle, if we don't want the ability >> to set --foo=default explicitly, I still think passing ints as booleans >> to the argument parser and checking if a boolean is neither true nor >> false is the wrong thing to do. I'd also like to convert to stdbool >> more. But those should not be a reason to convert essentially boolean >> arguments to keyword arguments. I think we need a way to have the >> argument parser tell us if an argument was present or not. > > id:20170930213239.15392-1-jani@nikula.org would make it easier to add, > say, a notmuch_bool_t *present field to notmuch_opt_desc_t that we could > set whenever we see the option and we want to know the difference. OK, I've queued that patch. Care to add `present` so we can unblock this discussion? d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch