Re: New test for exported symbols

Subject: Re: New test for exported symbols

Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:59:43 -0400

To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:51:14 -0800, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:
> As long promised, here is a test to compare the list of symbols
> retrieved with objdump to those from notmuch.sym
> 
> I didn't verify whether this runs properly during out of tree builds.

aidecoe did verify this for me on Gentoo, so I pushed these 

• Previous message (by thread): Re: New test for exported symbols

Thread:

• david@tethera.net—[PATCH] libnotmuch: build symbols list without relying on gcc -aux-info. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
  • david@tethera.net—[PATCH] libnotmuch: build symbols list without relying on gcc -aux-info. [inbox, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
    • Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: build symbols list without relying on gcc -aux-info. [inbox, signed, unread]
      • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: build symbols list without relying on gcc -aux-info. [inbox, signed, unread]
    • David Bremner—New test for exported symbols [inbox, unread]
      • David Bremner—[PATCH 1/2] test/symbol-hiding: add some whitespace between tests [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
      • David Bremner—[PATCH 2/2] test/symbol-hiding: compare exported symbols with existing one [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
      • David Bremner—Re: New test for exported symbols [inbox, unread]