Re: Remove positional arguments to dump and restore

Subject: Re: Remove positional arguments to dump and restore

Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:14:46 -0700

To: david@tethera.net, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Jameson Graef Rollins

On Fri, Aug 03 2012, david@tethera.net wrote:
> The positional argument to dump was deprecated quite a while ago. For
> restore, we never formally deprecated it. It seems a bit more
> consistent this way, but I don't mind leaving restore alone if people
> feel strongly about it.

LGTM.

jamie.

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH 1/2] notmuch-dump: remove deprecated positional argument for output file

Thread:

• david@tethera.net—Remove positional arguments to dump and restore [inbox, unread]
  • david@tethera.net—[PATCH 1/2] notmuch-dump: remove deprecated positional argument for output file [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH 1/2] notmuch-dump: remove deprecated positional argument for output file [inbox, unread]
  • david@tethera.net—[PATCH 2/2] notmuch-restore: replace positional argument for input with option [inbox, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
    • David Bremner—[PATCH v2] notmuch-restore: replace positional argument for input with option [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
      • david@tethera.net—[PATCH] NEWS: discuss changes for dump and restore syntax. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, notmuch::trivial, unread]
  • Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: Remove positional arguments to dump and restore [inbox, signed, unread]
  • Tomi Ollila—Re: Remove positional arguments to dump and restore [inbox, unread]