David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > Other than the bikeshed about starting from zero instead of one, and not > being completely happy with the option name --duplicate (but not being > inspired to suggest a better one), this series looks OK to me. > > It seems like it would be quite useful to query based on the number of > duplicates, but that is a much more ambitious task, I think. This series basically looks good to me too. I agree with all of the above points though. Best wishes Mark