Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes: > After test_emacs() has started emacs, it re-defines > itself as just calling the started emacs. > > First call to test_emacs() will execute to the end of it; > next calls will just execute the 2 lines, first clearing OUTPUT, > second and last executing TEST_EMACSCLIENT... > > This simplifies away one if constructs and reduces xtrace > output when doing test debugging with set -x. I was thinking about this, and wouldn't factoring out the first run stuff into a separate function be almost as good for debugging with set -x? d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org