On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:13:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pieter. > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:45:50 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote: > > `notmuch-search-operate-all' (bound to "*") adds and removes tags > > to/from all messages which match the query used to populate the > > current search buffer. > > > > --- > > > > Rebased to current master. > > > > Previous versions (chronologically): > > - id:"1309450108-2793-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" > > - id:"1309762318-4530-5-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" > > - id:"1310313335-4159-5-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" > > > > This looks like a useful patch series. We definitely need more tests > for tagging operations in the Emacs UI. Do you plan to revive it? > Absolutely. In fact, it's still alive and kicking on a local branch :) > Note that not so long ago I posted a bunch of tagging-related patches > [1] that would conflict with this patch at least because of > `notmuch-search-operate-all' being renamed to `notmuch-search-tag-all'. > Nice series! Will probably be pushed in the next few days, so I'll hold off on resubmitting the tests until then. > > > > test/emacs | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs > > index 8ca4c8a..e94ad94 100755 > > --- a/test/emacs > > +++ b/test/emacs > > @@ -124,6 +124,25 @@ test_emacs "(notmuch-show \"$os_x_darwin_thread\") > > output=$(notmuch search $os_x_darwin_thread | notmuch_search_sanitize) > > test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:XXX 2009-11-18 [4/4] Jjgod Jiang, Alexander Botero-Lowry; [notmuch] Mac OS X/Darwin compatibility issues (inbox unread)" > > > > +test_begin_subtest "Add/remove tags to/from all matching messages." > > +test_emacs '(notmuch-search "tag:inbox AND tags") > > + (notmuch-test-wait) > > + (notmuch-search-operate-all "+matching" "-inbox") > > + (notmuch-search "tag:matching AND NOT tag:inbox") > > + (notmuch-test-wait) > > + (test-output)' > > +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED > > + 2009-11-18 [3/3] Adrian Perez de Castro, Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] Introducing myself (matching signed unread) > > + 2009-11-18 [1/3] Carl Worth, Israel Herraiz, Keith Packard [notmuch] New to the list (inbox matching unread) > > + 2009-11-18 [2/2] Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags (matching unread) > > + 2009-11-18 [1/2] Keith Packard, Alexander Botero-Lowry [notmuch] [PATCH] Create a default notmuch-show-hook that highlights URLs and uses word-wrap (inbox matching unread) > > + 2009-11-18 [1/1] Jan Janak [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch new: Support for conversion of spool subdirectories into tags (matching unread) > > + 2009-11-18 [1/1] Stewart Smith [notmuch] [PATCH] Fix linking with gcc to use g++ to link in C++ libs. (matching unread) > > + 2009-11-17 [1/2] Ingmar Vanhassel, Carl Worth [notmuch] [PATCH] Typsos (inbox matching unread) > > +End of search results. > > +EOF > > +test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED > > I am worried that this test would break because of changes in other > tests. E.g. if a new test adds a new message which matches "tag:inbox > AND tags", this test would have to be updated. I think we should avoid > this. I see the following options here: > > * Search for messages which are less likely to change, e.g. "from:carl". > > * Rework the test to avoid using any fixed expected results, e.g.: > > - count all messages with tag:inbox > > - remove inbox tag, add some other distinct tag for all messages with > tag:inbox > > - count all messages with tag:inbox again, check that it is 0 > > - add the inbox tag back, remove the previously added tag, check the > message count > > I like the latter approach because it does not compare Emacs UI output > and hence would not break when that output changes. What do you think? > > Also, we should leave notmuch db in the same state as it was before the > test if possible. > Good point(s)! How about this: #+begin_src sh test_begin_subtest "Add/remove tags to/from all matching messages." expected=$(notmuch count from:cworth AND tag:inbox) test "${expected}" == "0" && expected="Need more matches!" # prevent false positives test_emacs "(notmuch-search \"from:cworth AND tag:inbox\") (notmuch-test-wait) (notmuch-search-operate-all \"+matching\" \"-inbox\")" output=$(notmuch count from:cworth AND tag:matching AND NOT tag:inbox) notmuch tag -matching +inbox -- from:cworth AND tag:matching AND NOT tag:inbox # restore db state! test_expect_equal "$output" "$expected" #+end_src > Regards, > Dmitry > > [1] id:"1327901644-15799-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com" > > > + > > test_begin_subtest "Message with .. in Message-Id:" > > add_message [id]=123..456@example '[subject]="Message with .. in Message-Id"' > > test_emacs '(notmuch-search "id:\"123..456@example\"") > > -- > > 1.7.8.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch Peace -- Pieter