On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:01:58 +0100, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
> also sprach Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> [2010.03.02.1337 +0100]:
> > Previously, we would output: 'On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:32:54 +0100,
> > Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:' now it is: 'On
> > 2010-02-25, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:'
> > 
> > In case we don't find a '<' (as indicator for 'Realname <email>'),
> > we still use the whole from address.
> 
> This makes me cringe. I don't think replying should be
> notmuch-functionality in the first place.

Hi,

I also see it a little bit strange to have reply in notmuch, but I don't
care if it works (which is unfortunately not the case, see my next
mail). You needn't use it if your MUA provides a different way of
replying.

There is indeed one interesting functionality in notmuch reply -
replying to multiple messages based on a search term. Currently it is a
little bit rough, but I can imagine I could use it some day.

Bye
Michal