Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter'

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter'

Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:47:56 +0100

To: Pieter Praet

Cc: Notmuch Mail, Austin Clements

From: David Edmondson

* pieter@praet.org [2011-07-13 Wed 15:16]
> David, would you mind rebasing it?

I'm sorry, I'm not likely to have time to do this.

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter'

Thread:

• Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
  • Pieter Praet—Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
    • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::wip, unread]
      • Pieter Praet—[PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
        • Pieter Praet—[PATCH 1/5] emacs: add property "matched-msgids" to each search result [inbox, notmuch::emacs, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
        • Pieter Praet—[PATCH 2/5] emacs: add some functions to fetch the matched-msgids of a (region of) search result(s) [inbox, notmuch::emacs, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
        • Pieter Praet—[PATCH 3/5] emacs: stashing (a region of) matched-msgids [inbox, notmuch::emacs, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
        • Pieter Praet—[PATCH 4/5] test: emacs: add/remove tags from all matching messages with `notmuch-search-operate-all' [inbox, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, notmuch::test, unread]
        • Pieter Praet—[PATCH 5/5] emacs: make `notmuch-search-operate-all' use matched-msgids instead of the original query string [inbox, notmuch::emacs, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
        • Austin Clements—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
          • Pieter Praet—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
            • Pieter Praet—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
              • Austin Clements—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::wip, unread]
                • Pieter Praet—[PATCH] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, notmuch::emacs, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
                • Pieter Praet—[PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, notmuch::emacs, notmuch::patch, notmuch::stale, notmuch::test, notmuch::wip, unread]
                  • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, unread]
                    • Pieter Praet—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, unread]
                      • David Edmondson—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, unread]
                      • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, unread]
                        • Pieter Praet—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [attachment, inbox, unread]
                        • servilio—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, unread]
                        • Austin Clements—JSON parsing performance (was Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter') [attachment, inbox, unread]
                    • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, signed, unread]
                      • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: bad regexp @ `notmuch-search-process-filter' [inbox, unread]
                • Austin Clements—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]
                  • Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • Austin Clements—Re: [PROTO] possible solution for "Race condition for '*' command" [inbox, unread]