David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > I started looking at William's sorting patches [1], but the > proliferation of sorting options bugged me a bit. I decided to sketch > out a new more flexible API. > > In the new API, there is is a sort "key", currently mapped one-to-one > to value slots, but potentially could do more sophisticated things > like making keys up dynamically (e.g. preprocessing subjects). > > The second parameter is a sort "type". Currently this is just > ascending or descending, but other potential options include > sort_by_relevance_then_value This is great, this is what I was thinking about as well. I'll try refactoring my sorting branch on top of these changes. -- https://jb55.com _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch