It seems no very recent system has gmime2.4. I guess several of these gmime2.4 only code paths are both security critical (e.g. in crypto.c) and mostly untested. Is there good reason to keep supporting gmime 2.4? d
Subject: proposal: remove support for gmime2.4
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:20:47 +0100
Cc:
From: David Bremner
It seems no very recent system has gmime2.4. I guess several of these gmime2.4 only code paths are both security critical (e.g. in crypto.c) and mostly untested. Is there good reason to keep supporting gmime 2.4? d