Re: [PATCH 1/2] STYLE: document some rules about variable declarations

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] STYLE: document some rules about variable declarations

Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 20:49:01 -0400

To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> No-one seemed opposed to C99 style loop variable declarations. The
> requirement to declare variables at the top of blocks is maybe a little
> more contested, but I believe it reflects the status quo.

pushed both of these style guide updates

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH 1/2] STYLE: document some rules about variable declarations

Thread:

• David Bremner—[PATCH 1/2] STYLE: document some rules about variable declarations [inbox, notmuch::doc, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, notmuch::trivial, unread]
  • David Bremner—[PATCH 2/2] STYLE: suggest long names [inbox, notmuch::doc, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, notmuch::trivial, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH 1/2] STYLE: document some rules about variable declarations [inbox, unread]