Without the proposed fix for deletion performance [1], this test is probably unreasonably slow compared to others at the same small/medium/large scale. [1]: id:20210414021627.1236560-3-david@tethera.net --- performance-test/T00-new.sh | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/performance-test/T00-new.sh b/performance-test/T00-new.sh index a14dd13f..53de1c27 100755 --- a/performance-test/T00-new.sh +++ b/performance-test/T00-new.sh @@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ perl -nle 'rename "$_.renamed", $_' $manifest time_run "new ($count mv back)" 'notmuch new' +xargs tar cf backup.tar < $manifest + +perl -nle 'unlink $_; unlink $_.copy' $manifest + +time_run "new ($count rm)" 'notmuch new' + +tar xf backup.tar + +time_run "new ($count restore)" 'notmuch new' + perl -nle 'link $_, "$_.copy"' $manifest time_run "new ($count cp)" 'notmuch new' -- 2.30.2 _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org