If Felipe is interested in maintaining the Vim plugin, I vote it should be replaced with his Ruby version. Please don't explain why you think emacs is better than vim. C. On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:34:48PM -0600, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@gmail.com> wrote: > > Quoting Felipe Contreras (2013-04-03 10:09:39) > >> ... > >> What you prefer is irrelevant; it's relevant only for you, that's why it's > >> called a *preference*, the rest of us prefer different things. > > > > Never mind preferences, I think originally, this thread was about dropping > > *support* for the *original* vim plugin that lives in notmuch/contrib. > > I think we can all agree that this is reasonable. > > The reasons for dropping the original vim script are exactly the same > reasons why it should be replaced with the ruby version. > > > This should not keep you from hacking on your script, hosting > > it whereever you like and support it. > > For me, one of the charms of notmuch is exactly this extensibility. > > Bpth are "my" scripts. I'm supposed to be the maintainer of the vim > script and I have commit access. > > -- > Felipe Contreras > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch -- +442077294797 (Office) +442031379505 (DDI) http://mediasp.com/