Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers

Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:59:51 +1000

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Output Reply-To headers when present in a message.
> > These were missing in text and json output formats.
> 
> I don't see why the Reply-To header is needed, given that we are
> constructing reply templates, but I guess if someone thinks it's needed
> I don't see much harm in including it.

I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply.

Peter

Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: add basic show, search --format=text tests

Thread:

Peter Wang—[PATCH 1/3] test: add basic show, search --format=text tests [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
- Peter Wang—[PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, notmuch::moreinfo, notmuch::patch, notmuch::stale, unread]
  - Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, notmuch::review, signed, unread]
    - Peter Wang—Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, unread]
      - Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, signed, unread]
        Peter Wang—Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, unread]
        Mark Walters—Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, unread]
        Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers [inbox, unread]
- Peter Wang—[PATCH 3/3] test: add test for showing Reply-To headers [inbox, notmuch::moreinfo, notmuch::patch, notmuch::stale, unread]
- Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: add basic show, search --format=text tests [inbox, notmuch::review, signed, unread]
- Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: add basic show, search --format=text tests [inbox, notmuch::review, unread]
- David Bremner—Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: add basic show, search --format=text tests [inbox, unread]