Quoth Adam Wolfe Gordon on Feb 25 at 3:25 pm: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 14:29, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote: > > By coincidence I "unpromoted it", perhaps because I was missing > > context. It seemed strange to push one patch from the middle of the > > series. > > I think that part was promoted by Austin because one of his > otherwise-ready patches relies on it, and it doesn't change any > functionality. > > Austin, can you confirm this? I was thinking that the reply formatter conversion depended on it, though I later realized that it doesn't really. I think this patch series and the reply formatter conversion won't commute anyway, but I think it'll be a simple fix either way.