On 00:54, Sun 21 Nov 10, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > your patch fixes the problem, but it also breaks one of the tests in
> > test suite. I created the test for your patch ...
> 
> and here is another test which was in my original synchronization
> patches, but Carl decided to remove it. It checks that tagging message
> by an unrelated tag does not move the message from new to cur. This test
> currently fails.
> 
> In id:"20100323143714.GE28596@blackspot" Ruben wrote that for some mail
> readers there is a difference between mails in new and mails without "S"
> flag in cur.
> 
> Ruben, is the current behavior problematic for you?

It's not a problem for me. For mutt (which I use often) to have it on 'new' or
'cur' don't makes any difference, if the 'S' flag is not there I see them as
'unread'. Actually in mutt if you read an email and later flags it as 'unread'
it moves the email 'cur' and puts the ':2,' without the 'S' flag.

For me is the same to have the email at 'new' or at 'cur', the only thing I
wanted is to have support to fetchmail new emails.

-- 
Rubén Pollán  | jabber:meskio@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Lo hago para no volverme loco cuando noto
que solo me queda un demonio en un hombro
por que se ha cortado las venas
el ángel que había en el otro.