On 19:57, Fri 27 Nov 09, Carl Worth wrote:
> (I'd like a verb that pairs better
> with "advance" than the non-verb "back"---any suggestions)?

What about regress?
I'm not a native English speaker, so maybe someone can suggest something better.

> So those won't need any new code. The one case that will need new code
> is that for notmuch_message_get_replies and
> notmuch_message_get_toplevel_messages the messages iterator is currently
> built on a singly-linked list. Making it doubly linked would obviously
> not be hard though.

I'm trying to convert it to a doubly linked list, but I'm not sure if I
understand well how they work.

I don't see how _notmuch_message_list_append works. It says "node can of course
point to an arbitrarily long list of nodes", but the code is:

void
_notmuch_message_list_append (notmuch_message_list_t *list,                
                  notmuch_message_node_t *node)                            
{   
    *(list->tail) = node;
    list->tail = &node->next;
}

Should not be something like:

void
_notmuch_message_list_append (notmuch_message_list_t *list,                
                  notmuch_message_node_t *node)                            
{   
    notmuch_message_node_t *next_node;

    *(list->tail) = node;
	for (next_node = node->next; next_node->next != NULL;
	     next_node = next_node->next);
	list->tail = &next_node->next;
}

Do I miss something? Or the function is just designed to work on a single node
not a list of them?


-- 
Rubén Pollán  | jabber:meskio@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
         No vamos a reivindicar nada,
            no vamos a pedir nada.
            Tomaremos, okuparemos.