Currently, by default k invokes the tag-jump menu, and following it by
r invokes the reverse tag change jump menu. This is awkward to type
(e.g. k r u for undoing a -unread change). This changes it so that k
followed by k invokes the reverse menu. We make the key for the
reverse map a variable as that makes it possible for a user to
change it by editing their .emacs file.
---
I think this is the right solution (suggested by Tomi on
irc). Previously it was not possible for the user to configure this
binding without some substantial lisp, or patching the source.
Best wishes
Mark
id:1475765990-15031-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com
emacs/notmuch-tag.el | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-tag.el b/emacs/notmuch-tag.el
index 49662c2..c03027f 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-tag.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-tag.el
@@ -485,6 +485,9 @@ begin with a \"+\" or a \"-\". If REVERSE is non-nil, replace all
s)))
tags))
+(defvar notmuch-tag-jump-reverse-key "k"
+ "The key in tag-jump to switch to the reverse tag changes.")
+
(defun notmuch-tag-jump (reverse)
"Create a jump menu for tagging operations.
@@ -523,9 +526,10 @@ and vice versa."
(push (list key name-string
`(lambda () (,tag-function ',tag-change)))
action-map)))
- (push (list "r" (if reverse
- "Forward tag changes "
- "Reverse tag changes")
+ (push (list notmuch-tag-jump-reverse-key
+ (if reverse
+ "Forward tag changes "
+ "Reverse tag changes")
(apply-partially 'notmuch-tag-jump (not reverse)))
action-map)
(setq action-map (nreverse action-map))
--
2.1.4