Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name.

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name.

Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:02:33 +0300

To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Mark Walters, Notmuch Mail

Cc:

From: Tomi Ollila


On Mon, Apr 16 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
>> id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"
>>
>> Does just "delete" -> "deleted" change: the only question I have left
>> is that should that be left as is, this change made, or just drop
>> the "delete" coloring altogether ?
>
> Sorry, yes, I suppose this patch should still be applied.  Excludes for
> "deleted" are the default, I believe, so if we are going to refer to it
> in documentation we should probably be consistent.

That said, the following change in nmbug repository

D    1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net needs-review
A    1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net trivial

pushed.

Tomi

>
> On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for
>>> adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile
>>> particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the
>>> time looked positive).
>>
>> Sorry, I wish I could have purged all of these series from the list.
>> After a very protracted discussion on the topic it was decided that
>> notmuch will not support any delete tagging operations.  Users who wish
>> to do so can add support on their own:
>
> I think my reaction here was a little strong.  I'm not remembering how I
> got the impression that there was more opposition to adding delete
> keybindings than there was support.  I suppose now that excludes work so
> well one (not me) might consider revisiting the issue.
>
> jamie.
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Thread: