On Sat, Dec 15 2012, David Bremner wrote:

> Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:45:33 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This version looks good to me with one very minor comments:
>>> 
>>> Perhaps the name format-omitted-part-meta should include sprinter (eg
>>> format-omitted-part-meta-sprinter)?
>>
>> Seems so. I'll roll up another series if that's necessary.
>
> Maybe just post the one amended patch as a reply to the patch it's
> amending?

The 'format_omitted_part_meta' in in context of 2 patches; Are you
planning to do the change sin one patch (3/4) only (or making 5/4
which changes naming) ?

And... The patch series looks good to me.

>
> d

Tomi