On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:58:22 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:32:58 +0200, Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im> wrote: > > Maybe I misunderstood original goal but what I had in mind reading this > > is certainly not editing a priviously received message in order to > > (re)send it again but sending a postponed/draft message which, I guess, > > means no full header(s) (no received header and such and probably > > partially filled header, if any). > > Hey, Xavier. I was just responding to Antoine's comment that he had > "trouble making message-mode digest an existing buffer". Oh well, sorry then ;) /Xavier