On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:

> This output prints how many times was each address encountered during
> search.
> ---
> [ nn lines removed]
>
>      ``--sort=``\ (**newest-first**\ \|\ **oldest-first**)
>          This option can be used to present results in either
>          chronological order (**oldest-first**) or reverse chronological
> @@ -56,6 +63,8 @@ Supported options for **address** include
>          By default, results will be displayed in reverse chronological
>          order, (that is, the newest results will be displayed first).
>  
> +	This option has no effect when used with --output=count.

This is not entirely true -- the order the addresses are gathered will
affect how the hash table is built up and it may affect how the addresses
are printed (unless the --sort option is ignored when --count is given,
which does not seem to be the case). 

The question is whether the accuracy of this message matters; some
nitpickers might complain ;)

Anyway, +1 from me to patches 1 - 9 -- these things could still be
adjusted when NEWS patch of the feature is prepared.


Tomi