On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:15:55 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:13:35 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote: > > > > [...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'? > > > > > > Nothing at all. I was fixing my own patch [1] without resorting to > > > requiring the `cl' package at runtime :) Would be nice if we could > > > get rid of the compile-time dependency as well, though. > > > > Can you explain why it's necessary at runtime? > > Because otherwise `remove-if-not' and `member-if-not' would > be void, as you alluded to previously [1,2]. Ah, not macros. Sorry for being slow.