On Nov 21, 2015 5:48 AM, "Tomi Ollila" <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote: > > > Exceptionally top-posting as the rest is left just for reference > (for anyone interested and loosing the thread context) > > Marking this as notmuch::fixed as > > https://github.com/notmuch/notmuch > > fixes this and is usually up-to-date (I use this link on one of my > notmuch installations) > > Interestingly the wiki is also in github (just that it is updated > March 28 -- based on https://github.com/notmuch ) Hi Tomi, My syncer for the wiki might have died, I'll check on it today! If anyone notice it falling out of sync please fell free to give me a shout. > > > Tomi > > > On Sun, Apr 27 2014, Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear NotMuch, > > > > I have just started using notmuch and I really love it! I've been using > > web interfaces and proprietary mail clients for almost a decade and mutt > > before that (because I never got on well with rmail or gnus). Now, I'm > > trying to get all my life-hacker aficionados to follow suit. > > > > I was wanting to submit an RFE for you and to browse your source code to > > see how hard it would be to implement, but I was disappointed that it is > > all hosted on your own git repository with no issue tracker. > > > > While I appreciate that you probably use notmuch as your work flow > > manager, it is also quite common to use a social website such as github > > or getsatisfaction to interface with users. In my experience, github > > dramatically increases the number of contributions from users, in the > > form of what github calls "pull requests" (if you're a git user but not > > a github user, the term is confusing). > > > > Would it be possible to have a github project for notmuch? I'm certain > > the git repositories could be synchronised easily. > > > > A bridge between github's issue tracker and notmuch would be entirely > > possible: they have an API that would allow addition and removal of > > tags, as well as editing tickets. Actually, I would probably use such a > > thing :-) > > > > But in any case, my RFE/question was this: how hard would it be to have > > an optional mode of behaviour where tags are stored in the message > > itself, so that syncing with an IMAP server (e.g. via offlineimap) > > would make the tags available on all devices. This would negate the need > > for workarounds, such as shared notmuch databases, when users have > > multiple machines. > > > > It would also allow applications like offlineimap to introduce a gmail > > plugin that would copy the message into a folder according to its tags, > > so gmail labels and notmuch tags would be in sync. > > > > Best regards, > > Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > > notmuch mailing list > > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch