Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?

Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?

Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:38:32 -0700

To: notmuch

Cc:

From: Jeremy Nickurak

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> Any other suggestions or ideas?

What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message?

- Aggregate the headers together, perhaps?
- Where headers disagree, display both
- If the bodies disagree, display both.

• Previous message (by thread): Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?

Thread:

• Daniel Kahn Gillmor—a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, signed, unread]
  • James Vasile—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, signed, unread]
    • Daniel Kahn Gillmor—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, unread]
      • Jeremy Nickurak—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, unread]
        • Tom Prince—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, unread]
  • Peter Wang—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, notmuch::bug, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, unread]
      • Daniel Kahn Gillmor—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, unread]
        • David Bremner—Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs? [inbox, unread]