Re: Unexpected output of "notmuch new --quiet"

Subject: Re: Unexpected output of "notmuch new --quiet"

Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:15:14 +0200

To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Ralph Seichter


* David Bremner:

> I could imagine more levels of quiet, but I don't know if it is worth
> the trouble.

I currently redirect stderr to /dev/null because the actual number of
these "ignoring non-mail file" notices is much higher, but that means I
don't get to see actual errors which is quite a disadvantage.

An option like --veryquiet or --errorsonly would be helpful, but I can
understand you asking if it would be worth the effort. For somebody like
me who uses Dovecot as a backend it would be. ;-)

> Could it maybe a wrapper script or hook invoked by notmuch new?

Ah! The post-new hook called umask and caused the output. Thanks.

-Ralph
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Thread: