Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:18 -0800

To: David Edmondson, Austin Clements

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Jeremy Nickurak

From: Jameson Graef Rollins


On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:52:52 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> I agree that as long as no keys are pre-bound it will make little
> difference. That just transfers the discussion to the thread about
> adding the bindings, which seems silly.

I think that's ok.  The tag exclusion is in, which is great.  The
next question, of whether we should setup excludes by default, is
intimately related to whether or not we support key bindings to add
those tags.  So I think it's fine to transfer the rest of this
discussion to that thread.

jamie.
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: