Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes: > > I'd say that unless there ever is problem with binary name `python` to make > those checks to succeed then we could think whether to depend on sh.config > existing... or do the same way resolving python as configure does. > OK, for now, since there is a very small group of users for release-checks.sh, let's wait for the hardcoded binary name to cause problems for someone. d