David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@ascii.art.br> writes: > > Long delayed reply: > > Your message finally reached the list and I've tagged it as a feature > request. Thanks! > I personally prefer to search for lists by List-Id. Can you explain a > bit why that doesn't work for you? Me too, but in many cases I have to search for the author of the message without remembering if the message was sent directly to me or via a mailing list. However, with mailing lists adopting DMARC, the From: header is being manipulated and can't be trusted for searches anymore [1]. If it's hard to understand what is happening, look at the From: header from this archived mbox [2] sent to libc-alpha. You will notice the different email addresses in From: and Reply-To:. I hope it helps to understand why a search for from:tuliom would not return that message. The mailing list had to do this so that people with a DMARC-enabled email could continue to receive messages from the mailing list. [1] https://dmarc.org/wiki/FAQ#I_operate_a_mailing_list_and_I_want_to_interoperate_with_DMARC.2C_what_should_I_do.3F [2] https://public-inbox.org/libc-alpha/878s26l76b.fsf@linux.ibm.com/raw > One implementation issue is that without adding another value slot, regular > expression searches would not work for things that were only in > Reply-To, which is pretty confusing. I don't know what the resource cost > of adding a value slot is, but I'm a bit leery of adding too many. I see. -- Tulio Magno _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org