On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:49:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:15:22 +0000, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> > So to clarify, do you prefer having on/off switches, or just enabling
> > this without customization at all? Personally I'd shy away from the
> > latter, but I guess it depends on how useful vs. distracting people find
> > this.
> 
> My opinion is to just make it a feature without any customization at
> all.  I can see no harm in having these searches always available.

That should clean up the code a bit as well. Then we're left with
picking the sensible names. I just use "other" and "no tags" myself. Do
you see value in e.g. surrounding them in brackets like "[other]" and
"[no tags]" to signify they are special? Better ideas? I'm not a native
speaker...

And while at it, how about also making append the non-customizable, IMHO
sensible, default for saved searches in patch 2/4?


Jani