Hello.

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:20 +0000, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:39:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:35:37 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Before the change, there were two ways to do search in Emacs UI:
> > > > search widget in notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search'
> > > > function bound to "s".  Internally, notmuch-hello search widget
> > > > uses `notmuch-search' function.  But it uses widget field input
> > > > instead of minibuffer.  Such duplication is a major issue for
> > > > notmuch-hello usability: search interface is inconsistent and
> > > > lacks features that are available in minibuffer (e.g. history and
> > > > auto completion).  Some of these features may be relatively easy
> > > > to implement for notmuch-hello search, others would be much more
> > > > tricky.  So to avoid duplication, make UI more consistent, bring
> > > > notmuch-hello search to feature parity with the minibuffer
> > > > search, the patch replaces notmuch-hello search widget and with a
> > > > button that works the same way as "s" key binding.
> > > 
> > > Dmitry, if Daniel re-submits his patches to allow the construction of
> > > `notmuch-hello' buffers to be configured, it seems that this patchset
> > > would become unnecessary. Is that correct?
> > 
> > Right.  We will just need to fix the 's' key binding.  Looking forward
> > for that.
> 
> Isn't (something like) this still needed to merge the search histories:
> 
> id:"1324698436-8532-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"
> 

I have sent a new patch series implementing the changes [1].

Regards,
  Dmitry

[1] id:1326828850-8519-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com

> 
> Jani.