Hi Thomas. On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:39:36 +0200, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote: > On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:45:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote: > > BTW there were patches to support tmux (or maybe it was dtach). IIRC > > the consensus was that supporting it does not worth complicating test > > lib. I think this can be reconsidered if it turns out that many users > > do not have screen, but do have tmux. But you never know if the > > patches are not applied. They have been around for several months, I > > doubt you would suddenly get feedback now. > > I'm the one that wrote the tmux patch (and suggested dtach), and yes in > the end the consensus was that it wasn't worth it. > > About adding prereqs to the test suite -- in my private branch I have a > rebased and fixed version of the patch series sent by Pieter Praet [1]. > It worked fine last time I tested it on a system without screen and in a > chroot without emacs/gpg/screen, so if anyone is interested I can post > it here. (Cc'ing Pieter) > Cool. You have Pieter's series plus a patch for screen, right? Please post it, I am interested :) Regards, Dmitry > [1] id:"1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" > > -- > Thomas/Schnouki