On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:14:19 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:31 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:52, Dmitry Kurochkin > > <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can we delay this patch until user-defined sections are pushed? I know > > > I promised to review it long ago. But I still did not manage to finish > > > it yet. I hope I can do it in the beginning of the next week. > > > > Absolutely. I was just building new notmuch packages for myself this > > morning and realized I had this commit sitting in my tree collecting > > dust. > > notmuch count is fast > notmuch count --output=threads is slower > > I was thinking why not show both? but as threads > count is slow there could be customization variable > for showing *optionally* thread count in addition > to message count like > > "You have nn,nnn messages in n,nnn threads" At the risk of reducing this to bikeshedding I would prefer an option to disable the counts totally: even counting messages is annoyingly slow. Maybe this will all be fixed by the user-defined sections patch though. Best wishes Mark