On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > What we could simply have at the time being: > > devel/nmbug/nmbug > devel/nmbug/nmbug.rst (or .1) > devel/nmbug/nmbug-status > devel/nmbug/nmbug-status.rst (or .1) > devel/nmbug/nmbug-status-config > devel/nmbug/nmbug-status-config.rst (or .5) > > (and if .rst:s, a Makefile to build the namual pages) This is closer to my “separate project” idea [1], and works for me as far as this series goes. By not providing install tooling, we also avoid David's concern about strongly linking the independent tools [2]. I'll push something like it in a v2. Once we land that, I may file a subsequent series renaming the scripts and configs to something more general. But we can hash that out in that series' thread. Cheers, Trevor [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/21535/focus=21536 id:20151231202815.GL3680@odin.tremily.us [2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/21535/focus=21537 id:87d1tm46ax.fsf@zancas.localnet -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy